The nurse staffing standards for patient safety essay

Effects on the environment A. There is no direct evidence that it is unsafe to employ LPNs in acute care settings, 4243 nor is there empirical support that the use of unlicensed personnel is intrinsically related to poor outcomes. For instance, data on falls may be consistently collected for all hospitalized patients but may not be particularly meaningful for obstetrical patients.


There may be skill-mix issues as well. Future research must tackle the black box of nursing practice by acknowledging the complexity of nursing assessment, planning, intervention, and evaluation. Knowledge about positive outcomes of care that are less likely to occur under low staffing conditions or are more likely under higher levels is extremely limited.

Major Methodological Considerations in This Literature Staffing Staffing levels can be reported or calculated for an entire health care organization or for an operational level within an organization a specific unit, department, or division.

No empirical evidence of this type was found. Irrespective of educational level, the quality of nurses' on-the-job training may also play a role in patient outcomes.

RN Essay: The Numbers Don’t Lie – Safe Staffing Saves Lives

Most researchers feel these statistics should reflect personnel who deliver direct care relevant to the patient outcomes studied. More States are Pursuing Safe-Staffing Legislation Sinceseveral states have pursued legislation addressing safe-staffing concerns in nursing.

Yet another area where data related to patient outcomes are thin relates to the impact of specific types of work environments on nurse-sensitive outcomes, and in particular the impact of the Magnet hospital model, which has been argued to produce superior patient outcomes and safer care.

Better late than never: These analyses linked unit-level staffing and safety-related outcomes data, and measured for time periods at the unit level closely and logically connected staffing measures relevant to conditions before the outcome occurred.

Considered key to safe staffing, professional judgment as the gold standard establishes the threshold for safe patient care in a given clinical setting, 59 as nurses use a systematic decision matrix to determine if the staff on a particular unit can accept responsibility for additional patients.

There is value for researchers to forge strategic partnerships with professional sponsors of public and private data repositories. Many patient outcomes measures such as potentially preventable mortality may actually be more meaningful if studied at the hospital level, while others such as falls may be appropriately examined at the unit level.

These included patient-centered outcomes considered to be markers of nursing care quality such as falls and pressure ulcers and system-related measures including nursing skill mix, nursing care hours, measures of the quality of the nursing practice environment which includes staffing ratiosand nursing turnover.

Additionally, it would restrict mandatory RN overtime to times of emergency. Data were drawn from 25 acute care, not-for-profit California hospital participants in the regional CalNOC.

However, despite significant growth in the number and sophistication of studies responding to public policy and provider demand for these findings, results have been inconsistent. Byvacancies for registered nurses at California hospitals plummeted by 69 percent.

Hospital characteristics and mortality rates. Among all healthcare practitioner and technical occupations, there were 65, nonfatal occupational injuries and illnesses that required a median of seven days away from work. Safe staffing improves nurse performance and patient-mortality rates, reduces turnover rates, staffing costs, and liability.

Major Integrative Reviews of the Staffing-Outcomes Literature The contrasts in the conclusions are interesting but are probably less important than the overall trend: These interruptions have been tied to an increased risk of errors, particularly medication administration errors.

High nurse-to-patient ratios are associated with an increase in medical errors, as well as patient infections, bedsores, pneumonia, MRSA, cardiac arrest, and accidental death.

Direct correlation to nurse staffing ratios B.Turnover of nursing staff will decrease with the passing of the “Safe Staffing for Quality Care Act”. Studies show that insufficient staffing causes nurse burnout, job dissatisfaction, higher turnover rate, and a decrease in patient.

 Missed Nursing Care, Staffing, and Patient Falls Grand Canyon University Nursing Research NursingV Angie Lawson, RN March 9, Introduction Patient safety is a concern in the hospital nursing care due to high nurse patient ratios, or staffing issues leads to patient falls.

Patient falls tend to be a big issue and expensive matter for hospitals nationwide. Nurses are the greatest defense for patient safety, so it is vital that safe RN staffing becomes a priority in hospital policy and budget.

Appropriate staffing saves lives! Decreasing RN numbers, in order to save money, decreases time spent with each patient and leads to more mistakes and lives lost. As a nurse assistant, staff nurse, charge nurse or nursing administrator, inadequate staffing creates tension and stress.

When staffing is inadequate patient safety, infection rates, patient satisfaction and staff satisfaction are only a few of the areas affected.

In conclusion, it is imperative that research based evidence be produced to see if mandated nurse staffing ratios do actually improve patient safety and whether or not.

The importance of nurse staffing to the delivery of high-quality patient care was a principal finding in the landmark report of the Institute of Medicine’s (IOM) Committee on the Adequacy of Nurse Staffing in Hospitals and Nursing Homes: “Nursing is a critical factor in determining the quality of care in hospitals and the nature of patient outcomes” 1 (p.

The Nurse Staffing Standards For Patient Safety


The nurse staffing standards for patient safety essay
Rated 5/5 based on 67 review